Tough, Knowledgeable Litigators

Photo of Professionals at Valente Law Firm

When can a sign language interpreter be accused of slander?

On Behalf of | Jun 24, 2025 | Defamation

Sign language interpreters play a vital role in helping deaf and hard-of-hearing audiences access spoken content during live events, broadcasts and public addresses. While most interpreters work with accuracy and professionalism, problems can arise when someone intentionally alters the message. When a deliberate misinterpretation causes harm to another person’s reputation, it may open the door to a slander claim.

Slander involves false and damaging communication shared with a third party. While it is commonly associated with spoken words, courts recognize that non-verbal gestures and facial expressions can also carry defamatory meaning. If a sign language interpreter knowingly distorts a message in a way that spreads false information, it could be treated as slander.

Elements of slanderous gestures that could lead to charges

Sign language interpreters should understand how specific non-verbal actions may support a slander claim:

  • False and damaging interpretation: If the interpreter adds or changes content that did not come from the original speaker, and that change damages someone’s reputation, it may be treated as a false statement. This includes misattributing criminal conduct, offensive behavior or personal attacks.
  • Delivery to a third party: Interpreting during a live broadcast or event means the message is publicly communicated. This could satisfy the requirement that the slanderous content be shared with others.
  • Use of misleading gestures or tone: Subtle changes in facial expressions, timing or emphasis can shift the meaning of a message. If an interpreter exaggerates a statement or introduces a mocking or accusatory tone, the message may appear more damaging than intended.
  • Intent to cause harm: When the misinterpretation is intentional and done with the goal of harming someone’s reputation, it may cross the line from a mistake to a slanderous act. This is especially relevant when the interpreter is not neutral and seeks to influence public opinion.

Defamation can occur even without words. In business litigation cases involving deliberate misinterpretation, a slander claim may focus on intent, harm and public impact. Legal guidance can help clarify rights and liabilities in such situations.